Measurement Information System Pain Interference Research Articles

Thresholds in PROMIS Scores Anchored to Subsequent Unscheduled Health Service Use Among People Diagnosed With Cancer.

To establish thresholds in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference, physical function, fatigue, and depression scores on the basis of their association with subsequent use of the emergency department (ED) or urgent care by people diagnosed with cancer. Retrospective data from 952 people seen at Henry Ford Cancer and insured through the Health Alliance Plan were analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effects models. The log odds of ED or urgent care use during 14 or 30 days after each patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment were related to PRO scores, while adjusting for comorbidity, sociodemographic, and tumor characteristics. Pain interference and physical function were associated with subsequent ED or urgent care visits, but fatigue and depression were not, and the results for 14- and 30-day visits were similar. Thresholds anchored in the likelihood of these visits differed according to cancer stage. For people with advanced cancer, a pain interference score of 60 or higher (odds ratio [OR] 3.75, [95% CI, 1.53 to 7.87]) and a physical function score lower than 40 (OR 2.94, [95% CI, 1.22 to 7.06]) produced the largest ORs with narrowest CIs for 30-day visits. For people with nonadvanced cancer, the thresholds of 65 for pain interference (OR 2.64, [95% CI, 1.40 to 5.01]) and 35 for physical function (OR 1.87, [95% CI, 1.01 to 3.45]) produced largest ORs with narrowest CIs for 30-day visits. These anchor-based thresholds in PROMIS scores can inform clinicians' actions with the goal of preventing ED or urgent care visits.

492 Pain and falls among persons with multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES/GOALS: Falls are very common among persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) due to the disabling symptoms associated with the disease. The relationship between pain and falls is underexplored. This study investigated the relationship between the facets of pain (intensity and interference) and falls in the context of co-occurring symptoms of MS. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: This is a survey-based study that included 915 adults with MS. Participants provided data on demographics, clinical data, concerns about falling, symptom severity, and occurrence of falls in the past 6 months. Participants also completed the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference and pain intensity short forms. Pain interference and pain intensity were separately entered into univariate and multivariable logistic regression models developed to examine the associations between falls incidence and pain. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, sex, years since diagnosis, MS type, Patient Determined Disease Steps, MS status, concerns about falling, fatigue severity, PROMIS depression short form, and PROMIS physical function short form. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Univariate regression analyses indicated that pain interference (OR = 1.05; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.06; p < 0.01) and pain intensity (OR = 1.03; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.04; p < 0.01) were both associated with falls. Only pain interference remained significantly associated with falls in multivariable regression analysis (OR = 1.02; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.05; p = 0.03). The model explained 25% of the variance in falls. Pain intensity was not associated with falls (OR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.01; p > 0.05) in multivariable regression analysis. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: The findings suggest that pain is associated with falls among PwMS. Interventions designed to reduce falls incidence among PwMS may consider the inclusion of pain management as an integral component of those programs.

Novel 3D MRI-Based Volumetric Assessment of Rotator Cuff Musculature Demonstrates Stronger Correlation with Preoperative Functional Status When Compared to the Goutallier Grading Scheme

The Goutallier classification (GC) is used to assess fatty atrophy in rotator cuff (RC) tears, yet limitations exist. A battery of 3D-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) volumetric scores (VS) was developed to provide comprehensive characterization of RC pathology. The purposes of this study were to: (1) Describe the correlation between GC and VS for supraspinatus changes in RC tears, (2) Characterize the chronicity of RC tears using the battery of 12 VS measurements, and (3) Compare GC and VS to determine which method most closely corresponds with preoperative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Preoperative shoulder MRIs were reviewed after arthroscopic RC repair. Preoperative GC stage and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) scores were collected. The battery of VS included fat infiltration (FIS), muscle size (MSS) and relative volume contribution (RCS) for each RC muscle. Backwards linear regression was performed to compare GC stage with preoperative PROMIS PF/PI to determine which VS measurement most closely correlated with preoperative PROMs. Eighty-two patients underwent RC repair (mean age 55±8.2 years, 63% male, 68% GC stage ≤1). In evaluation of the supraspinatus, there was a moderate positive correlation between GC and FIS (r = 0.459, p < 0.001); strong negative correlations were observed between MSS (r = -0.800, p < 0.001) and RCS (r = -0.745, p < 0.001) when compared to GC. A negligible linear correlation was observed between GC and preoperative PROMIS PF (r = -0.106, p = 0.343) and PI (r = -0.071, p = 0.528). On multivariate analysis, subscapularis MSS (beta > 0, p = 0.064) was a positive predictor, and subscapularis FIS (beta < 0, p = 0.137), teres minor MSS (beta < 0, p = 0.141) and FIS (beta < 0, p = 0.070) were negative predictors of preoperative PF (r = 0.343, p = 0.044); while supraspinatus MSS (beta > 0, p = 0.009) and FIS (beta > 0, p = 0.073), teres minor FIS (beta > 0, p = 0.072) and subscapularis FIS (beta > 0, p = 0.065) were positive predictors of preoperative PI (r = 0.410, p = 0.006). Although gold standard in evaluation of RC pathology, GC demonstrated negligible correlation with preoperative functional disability. Alternatively, a battery of 3D VS showed strong correlation with GC through a quantitative, comprehensive evaluation of the RC unit including several moderate predictors of preoperative functional disability.

Defining the Patient Acceptable Symptom State Using PROMIS Following Reconstruction of the Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity

Introduction/Purpose: Although reconstruction of the flexible progressive collapsing foot deformity (PCFD) has been shown to improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs), there is limited data describing postoperative success as defined by patient satisfaction following surgery. Distinct from the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), the patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) is a novel PRO measurement that represents the symptom threshold beyond which patients are satisfied with their postoperative outcome. The primary aim of this study was to use Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) scores in combination with anchor questions to define PASS thresholds following reconstruction of the flexible PCFD. A secondary aim was to analyze how patient-specific variables and certain PCFD reconstruction procedures may impact the probability of reaching PASS thresholds. Methods: Using data collected from a foot and ankle orthopedic registry at a large academic institution, 109 patients who underwent reconstruction of a flexible PCFD between February 2019 and March 2021, had preoperative and 2-year postoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores, and 2-year postoperative responses to two PASS anchor questions (the delighted-terrible scale and the satisfied scale) were included in the study. Patients who underwent either a double or triple arthrodesis were excluded. Patient responses to the anchor questions were dichotomized and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed. Using the Youden Index to balance sensitivity and specificity and maximize the area under the curve (AUC), PASS thresholds with 95% confidence intervals were quantified using 2000 bootstrapped iterations. Lastly, multivariable logistic regressions were performed to analyze the influence of patient demographics, preoperative PROMIS scores, and certain PCFD reconstruction procedures on the probability of reaching the PASS thresholds. Results: The PASS threshold for PROMIS PF was found to be 42.6 using both the delighted-terrible and the satisfied scale and 73.4% of patients (80/109) reached the threshold (both AUCs: 0.91) (Table 1). The PASS thresholds for PROMIS PI defined using the delighted-terrible scale and the satisfied scale were 54.5 (AUC: 0.90) and 57.5 (AUC: 0.91), respectively, with 72.5% of patients (79/109) and 81.7% of patients (89/109) meeting the respective thresholds. Neither patient demographics nor specific PCFD reconstruction procedures affected the probability of meeting the PASS thresholds. However, a lower preoperative PROMIS PF score or a higher preoperative PROMIS PI score significantly decreased the probability of achieving the PASS thresholds. Conclusion: Following reconstruction of the flexible PCFD, PASS thresholds for the PROMIS PF and PI domains were found to be lower and higher, respectively, than population norms. This suggests that patients may be satisfied with the outcome of their surgery despite not returning to the population mean. The probability of achieving the PASS thresholds was influenced by both preoperative PROMIS PF and PI scores but not by patient demographics or certain PCFD reconstruction procedures. In addition to guiding future outcomes research, these results may help foot and ankle surgeons optimize treatment for the flexible PCFD and better manage patient expectations.

Socioeconomic Status Correlates With Initial Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) Scores but Not the Likelihood of Spine Surgery.

Objective To explore how socioeconomic status and patient characteristics may be associated with initial self-reports of pain and determine if there was an increased association with undergoing spine surgery. Methods Patients at an academic center between 2015 and 2021 who completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI) questionnaire were included. Multivariable linear regression models were used to determine the association between insurance type and patient factors with initial reports of pain. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to determine the association between PI and the likelihood of surgery in two time periods,three and 12 months. Results The study included 9,587 patients. The mean PROMIS-PI scores were 61.93 (SD 7.82) and 63.74 (SD 6.93) in the cervical and lumbar cohorts, respectively.Medicaidand Workers' Compensation insurance patients reported higher pain scores compared to those with private insurance: Medicaid (cervical: 2.77, CI (1.76-3.79), p<0.001; lumbar (2.05, CI (1.52-2.59), p<0.001); Workers' Compensation (cervical: 2.12, CI (0.96-3.27), p<0.001; lumbar: 1.51, CI (0.79-2.23), p<0.001). Black patients reported higher pain compared to White patients (cervical: 1.50, CI (0.44-2.55), p=0.01; lumbar: 1.51, CI (0.94-2.08), p<0.001). Higher PROMIS-PI scores were associated with a higher likelihood of surgery. There was no increased association of likelihood of surgery in Black, Medicaid, or Workers' Compensation patients when controlling for pain severity. Conclusion Black patients and patients with Medicaid and Workers' compensation insurance were likely to report higher pain scores. Higher initial pain scores were associated with an increased likelihood of surgery. However, despite increased pain scores, Black patients and those with Medicaid and Workers' Compensation insurance did not have a higher likelihood of undergoing surgery.

Preoperative Mobile Health Data Improve Predictions of Recovery From Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Neurosurgeons and hospitals devote tremendous resources to improving recovery from lumbar spine surgery. Current efforts to predict surgical recovery rely on one-time patient report and health record information. However, longitudinal mobile health (mHealth) assessments integrating symptom dynamics from ecological momentary assessment (EMA) and wearable biometric data may capture important influences on recovery. Our objective was to evaluate whether a preoperative mHealth assessment integrating EMA with Fitbit monitoring improved predictions of spine surgery recovery. Patients age 21-85 years undergoing lumbar surgery for degenerative disease between 2021 and 2023 were recruited. For up to 3 weeks preoperatively, participants completed EMAs up to 5 times daily asking about momentary pain, disability, depression, and catastrophizing. At the same time, they were passively monitored using Fitbit trackers. Study outcomes were good/excellent recovery on the Quality of Recovery-15 (QOR-15) and a clinically important change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference 1 month postoperatively. After feature engineering, several machine learning prediction models were tested. Prediction performance was measured using the c-statistic. A total of 133 participants were included, with a median (IQR) age of 62 (53, 68) years, and 56% were female. The median (IQR) number of preoperative EMAs completed was 78 (61, 95), and the median (IQR) number of days with usable Fitbit data was 17 (12, 21). 63 patients (48%) achieved a clinically meaningful improvement in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference. Compared with traditional evaluations alone, mHealth evaluations led to a 34% improvement in predictions for pain interference (c = 0.82 vs c = 0.61). 49 patients (40%) had a good or excellent recovery based on the QOR-15. Including preoperative mHealth data led to a 30% improvement in predictions of QOR-15 (c = 0.70 vs c = 0.54). Multimodal mHealth evaluations improve predictions of lumbar surgery outcomes. These methods may be useful for informing patient selection and perioperative recovery strategies.

Development of a Group Curriculum for Children With Congenital Upper Limb Difference (CULD) and Their Caregivers.

Caring for patients with congenital upper limb differences (CULD) requires an understanding of unique psychosocial challenges. The study purpose was to describe the needs of children with CULD and their caregivers to develop a group curriculum. This mixed-method study included 13 mothers and one father of children with CULD (age 3 months to 14 years; mean 7.2 ± 4.3 years) using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Parent Proxy Reports and caregiver interviews. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Peer Relationships (M = 48.1 ± 10.9) and Pain Interference (M = 44.5 ± 7.5) T-scores were average with below average scores for Physical Function: Upper Extremity (M = 31.9 ± 12.1). Caregivers expressed high interest in groups to create community and mutual support covering themes of responding to questions from strangers, social and coping skills, building self-confidence, accessing resources, advocacy skills, and advice from adults with CULD. Access to a support group with a curriculum addressing CULD-related patient and family needs may improve care.

Patients With and Without Double Crush Syndrome Achieve Similar Rates of Clinical Improvement Following Carpal Tunnel Release.

The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients with and without double crush syndrome (DCS), defined as concurrent carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and cervical radiculopathy at C5-T1 on preoperative nerve conduction studies. Patients with preoperative nerve conduction studies who underwent unilateral, isolated CTR were retrospectively identified. All patients completed preoperative and 3-month postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) upper extremity (UE) and pain interference (PI), and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaires, and responded to the anchor question: "Since your treatment, how would you rate your overall function?" (much worse, worse, slightly worse, no change, slightly improved, improved, much improved). Preoperative, postoperative, and changes in scores for UE, PI, and QuickDASH were compared, as were the anchor question responses and rates of achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Sixty-three patients with DCS and 115 patients with CTS only were included. At 3- to 4-month follow-up, absolute and change in UE, PI, and QuickDASH scores were not statistically different between patients with DCS and CTS. Rates of anchor question response and MCID achievement were comparable for patients with CTS only and DCS on each questionnaire. The MCID achievement ranged from 48.4% to 68.8% in the unmatched cohort and 48.4% to 60% in the matched group. At 3 to 4 months, patients with DCS experience similar patient-reported symptomatic and functional improvement, and achieve MCID of outcome measures at comparable rates to patients with CTS only. For patients with nerve compression at the carpal tunnel and cervical spine, CTR is a reasonable first step prior to proceeding with cervical spine decompression.

Using PROMIS Scores to Provide Cost-Conscious Follow-up After Foot and Ankle Surgery.

National campaigns in the United States, such as Choosing Wisely, emphasize that decreasing low-value office visits maximizes health care value. Although patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are frequently used to quantify postoperative outcomes, they have not been assessed as a tool to help guide clinicians consider alternatives or discontinue in-person follow-up visits. The purpose of this study is to assess the frequency and cost of in-person follow-up visits after patients report substantial improvement defined as 2 consecutive improvements above preoperative Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores. Retrospective PROMIS PI data were obtained between 2015 and 2020 for common elective foot (n = 759) and ankle (n = 578) surgical procedures. Patients were divided into quartiles according to their preoperative PI score. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate time to substantial improvement. Substantial improvement was defined as having 2 consecutive postoperative minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) above preoperative PROMIS PI scores. MCID was measured using the distribution-based method. Multivariable negative binomial models were used to determine the number of visits and direct associated costs after substantial improvement. The cost to payors was estimated using reimbursement rates. Within 3 months, 12% to 46% of foot and 16% to 61% of ankle patients achieved substantial improvement. Results vary by preoperative pain quartile, with patients who report higher preoperative pain scores achieving earlier improvement. After achieving substantial improvement, foot and ankle patients averaged 3.60 and 4.01 follow-up visits during the remaining 9 months of the year. Visit costs averaged $266 and $322 per foot and ankle patient respectively. Postoperative follow-up visits are time-consuming and costly. Physicians might consider objective measures, such as PROMIS PI, to determine the need, timing, and alternatives for in-person follow-up visits for elective foot and ankle surgeries after patients demonstrate reliable clinical improvement. Level III, retrospective cohort study at a single institution.

What are patients' perspectives on the value of physical therapy? A prospective cohort study.

To assess and identify patients' perceptions about the overall value of physical therapy services for musculoskeletal conditions and how these values were associated with their outcomes. The association between the perceived value of physical therapy (as a score) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference and physical function at 6-weeks was assessed in a prospective cohort. Generalised linear models were used to identify relationships between the value of physical therapy score and PROMIS outcomes. Kendall's tau was used to identify correlations between responses and outcomes. A total of 133 participants met the final inclusion criteria. The majority of participants were female (63.9%) with a mean age of 55.53 (SD 15.36) years. A majority of participants (63.9%) reported a previous positive personal experience with physical therapy. There was no significant relationship between perceived value of physical therapy and pain interference (β -0.32, p=0.07, 95% CI-0.67, 0.03) or physical function (β 0.19, p=0.29, 95% CI-0.16, 0.54). Stronger beliefs in agreement with the value of non-invasive treatment were significant, but weakly correlated with lower pain interference (r=-0.18, p=0.048) and higher physical function scores (r=0.22, p=0.03). Participants had an overall positive perception of the value of physical therapy prior to initiating physical therapy, but this perception was not associated with 6-week pain and function outcomes. A better understanding of the driving factors encouraging patients to seek physical therapy services is needed to provide value-based care.

Understanding Overall Shoulder Function and Health: The Value of Specific Quantitative Versus Qualitative Shoulder Range of Motion on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Hypothesis and BackgroundIt is known that, though widely used, shoulder range of motion (ROM) measurements are not standardized and have a high rate of intra- and interobserver differences. Particularly, the inconsistency in quantitative and qualitative measurements and their relationship to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) make shoulder health difficult to determine. MethodsThis was a prospective study of 147 patients who presented with a chief complaint of shoulder pain to the orthopedic sports medicine and shoulder clinic of a single fellowship-trained surgeon. Measured by one examiner, quantitative ROM measurements were taken with a goniometer and qualitative ROM measured by the anatomic level that the patient could reach. The following PROMs were used as well: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (DASH), 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference short form 6a (PROMIS 6a). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS using Pearson correlation and two-sample t-test. Benjamini-Hochberg correction was used to determine p-value at which statistical significance was reached to correct for multiple comparisons. ResultsQualitative internal rotation (IR), (the hand behind back reach test) and qualitative forward flexion (FF) correlated with all goniometer angle measurements and PROMs (both shoulder and general health scores). These qualitative measures proved to be an appropriate proxy for IR and FF goniometer measurements. Qualitative external rotation (ER) was not a good substitute for quantitative ER measurement. Quantitative ER correlated with all PROMs. As ROM increased when measured by quantitative ER, qualitative IR, and qualitative FF, shoulder and general health PROMs incrementally increased as well. Discussion/ConclusionQualitative IR measurement, the hand-behind-back reach test, is an adequate substitution for IR goniometer angle as well as a strong representation of global shoulder ROM, shoulder health, and general health while factoring in patient age. Qualitative FF measurement is also an appropriate proxy for quantitative FF and represents global shoulder and general health without factoring in age. Quantitative ER via goniometer angle, is a better assessment of the shoulder than qualitative ER and is a representation of overall shoulder and general health. We recommend the use of quantitative ER, qualitative IR, and qualitative FF measurements to best understand a patient’s overall shoulder health and its impact on their overall health.

Particulated Juvenile Articular Cartilage Allograft Transplantation for Patellofemoral Defects Shows Favorable Return-to-Sport Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes

PurposeTo report return to sport rates, postoperative patient reported outcomes (PRO), complications, and reoperation rates of a cohort of patients undergoing particulated juvenile articulated cartilage (PJAC) allograft transplantation for patellofemoral articular cartilage defects. MethodsSingle-institution retrospective review from 2014 to 2022 was performed of all patients with patellofemoral articular cartilage defects who received PJAC allograft transplantation. Baseline demographics and surgical data, including concomitant surgeries performed, were collected. Clinical outcomes recorded included return to sport rates, complications, reoperations, and the following PRO scores: Kujala knee score, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), and Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) scores. ResultsForty-one knees with a mean age of 23.4 ± 9.7 years and mean follow up of 30.3 months (range, 12 to 107 months) were included. The mean respective postoperative PROMIS-PI, PROMIS-PF, and Kujala knee scores were 47.4 ± 7.7, 52.2 ± 10.8, and 81.7 ± 16.1, reflecting low residual anterior knee pain and return to normal function. For patients playing organized sports at the high school and collegiate level, overall return to sport rate was 100% (17 out of 17). During follow up, 12 knees (29.3%) developed a complication, the most common of which was anterior-based knee pain, and 6 knees (14.6%) required a total of 8 reoperations, which occurred from 6 to 32 months postoperatively. ConclusionThe 100% return to sport rate and satisfactory PRO scores suggest that PJAC allograft transplantation can effectively address patellofemoral cartilage defects in many patients. The respective complication and reoperation rates of 29.3 and 14.6% are consistent with the challenging and heterogenic etiology and treatment of patellofemoral articular defects.

Factors Affecting Patient Reported Outcomes Following Tibial Plateau Fracture

Background/Objective: &#x0D; Tibial Plateau Fractures (TPFs) account for ~1% of all fractures and ~8% of all fractures in the elderly. Despite the frequency and severity of TPFs there is a paucity of data evaluating factors that affect patient recovery after injury and surgical fixation. We hypothesized that patient reported outcomes are modulated by several variables including patient demographics, comorbidities, injury characteristics, and Social Determinants of Health (SDH).  &#x0D; Methods: &#x0D; In this retrospective cohort study, we collected the interval patient reported outcome scores (PROs) of patients with TPFs treated with open reduction internal fixation occurring between February 2013 and November 2020. PROs included 1) Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, 2) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI) scores, and 3) Physical Function (PF) survey scores. Patient demographics, comorbidities, fracture characteristics, insurance status, and area deprivation index (ADI) of the patient’s residence were collected via electronic medical record review. Bivariate analyses of PRO scores to the aforementioned factors were performed using generalized estimating equations to account for participant repeated measures, with p&lt;0.05 being considered significant. &#x0D; Results: &#x0D; 196 patients were evaluated with &gt;1 year follow-up. It was determined that patients’ insurance status affected their VAS (p0&lt;.001), PI (p&lt;0.001), and PF (p&lt;0.001) scores. Patient ADI affected VAS (p&lt;0.001) and PI (p=0.0026), with increased ADI scores resulting in worse PROs. Diabetes and depression were found to negatively impact VAS (p=0.010 &amp; 0.008 respectively) and PI (p=0.0044 &amp; 0.0048, respectively). Additionally, age and sex both influence VAS (p=0.0006 &amp; 0.0033, respectively), and compartment syndrome was associated with decreased PF (p=0.0206).  &#x0D; Conclusion and Potential Impact: &#x0D; To our knowledge, this is the first investigation to evaluate the effect of SDH on patient recovery following surgical fixation of TPFs—suggesting that insurance status and residence ADI scores are associated with worsened PROs. Further investigation is necessary to identify if these factors are independent of other covariates. 

Preoperative Factors Associated With Worse PROMIS Pain Interference 2 Years After Hand and Wrist Surgery.

The purpose of this study was to identify preoperative factors associated with worse postoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference (PI) scores 2 years after hand and wrist surgery. We hypothesized that older age, more comorbidities, increased substance use, and lower socioeconomic status would correlate with worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores. This study was a retrospective review of prospectively acquired data on 253 patients. Surveys were administered within 1 week of surgery and 2 years postoperatively. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify significant predictors of worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores and change in PROMIS PI scores. Older age, higher body mass index, more comorbidities, lower preoperative expectations, more prior surgeries, unemployment, smoking, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, and multiple other socio-demographic factors were correlated with worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores (P ≤ .018). Similar factors were also correlated with less improvement in 2-year PROMIS PI scores (P ≤ .048). Worse scores on all preoperative patient-reported outcome measures correlated with worse 2-year PROMIS PI scores (P ≤ .007). Multivariable analysis identified smoking history, less frequent alcohol consumption, worse preoperative PROMIS social satisfaction and Numeric Pain Scale whole body scores, and higher ASA scores as independent predictors of worse 2-year PROMIS PI. The same factors in addition to better baseline PROMIS PI were predictive of less improvement in 2-year PROMIS PI. Numerous preoperative factors were predictive of worse postoperative 2-year PROMIS PI and less improvement in 2-year PROMIS PI for patients undergoing hand and wrist surgery.

Deep Peroneal Neurectomy for Midfoot Arthritis: A Comprehensive Review, Surgical Technique, and Case Series

Patients with painful midfoot arthritis unsuccessfully treated with conservative measures have been historically left with the surgical option of midfoot arthrodesis as a definitive treatment. In recent years, excision of the deep peroneal nerve has been offered as a potential alternative. Existing literature on the outcomes of patients undergoing deep peroneal neurectomy for the treatment of midfoot arthritis is limited and piecemeal. In this comprehensive review, technique guide, and retrospective case series, we consolidate the evidence around deep peroneal neurectomy for midfoot arthritis, review operative technique, and determine the outcomes of 4 patients who underwent deep peroneal neurectomy from February 2021 to December 2022 using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Physical Function and Pain Interference scores. Four original articles from National Center for Biotechnology Information Medline, published through May 2023, were included. The outcomes of patients treated with deep peroneal neurectomy for midfoot arthritis are discussed. In our case series, the average amount of time between surgery and final postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System scores was 289 days. The average preoperative physical function score was 36.8. Three patients showed a minimal clinically important difference in physical function; postoperative average was 41.3. Three patients had a minimally clinical important reduction in pain levels (average preoperative pain interference score was 65.8; average postoperative pain interference score was 59.3). One patient underwent a revision neurectomy for inadequate pain relief, and another sought additional treatment for inadequate pain relief. All patients returned to walking in a shoe within 1 month. The outcomes of our case series are similar to those of previously published case series, which demonstrate satisfactory results and acceptable complication rates. For patients with symptomatic midfoot arthritis, deep peroneal neurectomy can be an effective treatment option to reduce pain and improve physical function while requiring minimal postoperative recovery time.

Effects of live-online, group mindfulness training on opioid use and anxiety during buprenorphine treatment: A comparative effectiveness RCT

BackgroundOffice-based opioid treatment with buprenorphine has emerged as a popular evidence-based treatment for opioid use disorder. Unfortunately, psychosocial stress, anxiety, pain, and co-morbid substance use increase patients' risk for relapse. We designed this study to compare the effects of complementing buprenorphine treatment with 24 weeks of a live-online Mindful Recovery Opioid Care Continuum (M-ROCC) group to a time and attention-matched, live-online Recovery Support Group (RSG) active control condition. MethodsWe plan to enroll a maximum of N = 280 and randomize at least N = 192 patients prescribed buprenorphine through referrals from office-based and telemedicine buprenorphine treatment providers and social media advertisements. Participants will be randomly assigned to M-ROCC or RSG and will be blinded to their treatment condition. The primary outcome for this study will be biochemically confirmed periods of abstinence from illicit opioids, as measured by self-reported use and randomly collected, video-observed oral fluid toxicology testing during the final 12 weeks of study participation. Secondary outcomes include changes in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety and pain interference scores between baseline and week 24. ResultsThe trial was funded by the National Institutes of Health, HEAL Initiative through NCCIH (R33AT010125). Data collection is projected to end by September 2023, and we expect publication of results in 2024. ConclusionIf the M-ROCC intervention is found to be effective in this format, it will demonstrate that live-online mindfulness groups can improve outcomes and address common co-morbidities like anxiety and pain during buprenorphine treatment.

Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of Pain Before and After Removal of Nonobstructing Renal Calculi: A CoRE Initiative.

Flank pain associated with stone disease is typically caused by a stone that obstructs urine flow. However, it is plausible that nonobstructing kidney stones may still cause pain. We performed a multicenter, observational trial to evaluate whether treatment of small nonobstructing calyceal stones improves pain and kidney stone-specific health-related quality of life. Patients aged 18 years or older with nonobstructing renal stone(s) up to 10 mm in longest diameter and moderate to severe pain were recruited. All participants completed 3 questionnaires: the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System pain interference form 6a, and the Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire. Thereafter, all participants underwent ureteroscopy for renal stone treatment. All 3 questionnaires were repeated at 2, 6 to 8, and at 12 weeks postprocedure. The primary outcomes were change in preoperative to 12-week postoperative mean BPI score and worst BPI pain score. A total of 43 patients with nonobstructing kidney stones and associated flank pain were recruited. All stones were removed. Preoperatively, BPI scores for mean pain and worst pain were 5.5 and 7.2, respectively which decreased to 1.8 and 2.8 respectively at 12 weeks postoperatively. Wisconsin Stone Quality of Life questionnaire mean score increased from 70.4 to 115.3 at 12 weeks postoperatively. A total of 86% and 69% of patients had at least a 20% and 50% reduction in their mean pain scores, respectively. This study determined that patients benefit significantly from the removal of calyceal nonobstructing kidney stones for at least 12 weeks with a reduction in pain and an increase in quality of life. Therefore, surgical removal of these stones in this patient population should be offered as a treatment option.

Design of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial comparing the effectiveness of shared decision making versus motivational interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy for voluntary opioid tapering: The INSPIRE study protocol

BackgroundThis paper describes the design and protocol of a pragmatic, randomized trial to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of shared decision making versus motivational interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain for the voluntary tapering of opioid dose in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Integrated Services for Pain: Interventions to Reduce Pain Effectively (INSPIRE) is a multicenter, randomized trial conducted at three academic health centers in the southeastern United States. Participants are adults receiving long-term opioid therapy of at least 20 morphine milligram equivalents daily for chronic noncancer pain. MethodsParticipants were randomized to either the shared decision-making intervention or the motivational interviewing session and cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain intervention. All participants also received guideline-concordant care supporting opioid pharmacotherapy. The primary outcome was change from baseline in average daily prescribed opioid dose at 12 months, using prescribing data from electronic health records. Secondary outcomes were Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain Interference and Physical Function at 12 months. ConclusionThis trial evaluates the comparative effectiveness of shared decision making versus motivational interviewing plus cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic pain for the voluntary tapering of opioid dose in adults with chronic noncancer pain. Results from this study can guide clinicians, researchers, and policymakers as they seek to reduce opioid prescribing and improve management of chronic pain. Clinical trials registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03454555 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT03454555). Participant enrollment began on June 26, 2019.

Assessing Pain Severity in Sickle Cell Disease Using Animations and a Graphical Body Image

Introduction: Adults living with sickle cell disease (SCD) most frequently seek medical care due to pain. To determine the most efficacious treatment plan for patients presenting with pain, providers must first accurately assess and diagnose the pain. Unfortunately, the current approaches for assessing pain are inadequate. Combined with medical provider biases, patients can often have their pain symptoms misinterpreted, ignored, or blatantly dismissed. To address this issue, we partnered with stakeholders, human-centered designers, and software engineers to design a novel pain assessment tool, called Painimation. Painimation allows patients to communicate their pain quality, intensity, and location using abstract animations and a paintable body image. Painimation has been validated in a general population with chronic pain, but there is limited data validating this approach in SCD. Preliminary data on the use of Painimation by adults with SCD (N = 67) found that those who described their pain using the “throbbing” animation had less severe pain symptoms than those endorsing the “shooting” animation. Objective: To replicate and extend prior findings by determining whether pain animations and body image data are associated with pain outcomes in a large cohort of adults with SCD. We hypothesized that the presence of shooting pain and greater body surface areas affected by pain would be associated with more severe pain outcomes and mental health symptoms. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis on baseline data from the “Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Real-Time Pain Management Intervention for Sickle Cell via Mobile Application (CaRISMA)” Trial-a multisite randomized, controlled trial in adults with SCD and chronic pain. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to either digital cognitive behavioral therapy or digital education; in addition, both arms received at least 12 weeks of health coach support. At baseline, participants completed a battery of questionnaires and tracked their pain intensity (0-10) by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and mood daily via a mobile app. The Painimation app presents a front and back 2-dimensional body image that is paintable to indicate areas affected by pain. Users choose from abstract animations intended to represent different pain qualities; the intensity of the animations can be adjusted, and up to three can be selected. For the purpose of the analyses, participants were categorized into “Shooting Pain” vs “No Shooting Pain” and “Throbbing with Shooting and Stabbing” vs “Throbbing Alone,” based on our prior study. Participants were also split into groups based on whether the proportion of the body image painted was less than the median (&amp;lt;9.8% vs &amp;gt;=9.8%). Baseline characteristics and demographics were compared between groups, and multivariable regressions were used to estimate covariate-adjusted associations with the following outcomes at baseline: daily pain, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain interference scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Current Opioid Misuse Measure (COMM-9), and Adults Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-Me) pain severity and frequency. Results: The trial enrolled 359 adults, mean age 36.3 (SD = 10.5), 66% female, 93% Black race. The “Shooting” painimation and greater body image scores were associated with all outcomes in univariate analyses (all p&amp;lt;0.01; Table 1) except for the proportion of “happy” mood days and anxiety scores. After controlling for age, depression, anxiety, % body image, and site, the shooting animations were independently associated with greater daily pain intensity (beta = 0.64; p = 0.046). After controlling for age, depression, and site, greater body image score was associated with daily pain intensity (beta = 1.18; p &amp;lt; 0.001), pain interference (beta = 2.87; p &amp;lt; 0.001), ASCQ-Me pain frequency (beta = 3.91; p =&amp;lt; 0.005), and ASCQ-Me pain severity (beta = 4.50; p = 0.002). Conclusion: Both the “shooting” animation and body image measures were associated with more severe pain outcomes. This study demonstrates that animations and body image data can be used to assess pain severity in SCD, more objectively than the 0-10 numeric VAS scale. Future studies should explore whether pain location and specific animation selected are associated with pain etiology, and determine whether this approach can differentiate different types of pain in SCD.

Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures to Identify Factors Associated with Impaired Physical Function in Younger and Older Adults Living with Sickle Cell Disease

Background Improvements in disease management techniques have led to increases in the life expectancy of individuals with sickle cell disease (SCD). Despite the increasing number of older adults with SCD (defined as age ≥ 40 years), there is limited data on how symptoms experienced by this population such as pain, sleep, depression, and fatigue impact how they function day-to-day. In this study, we sought to determine which modifiable patient-reported factors most strongly correlate with patient reported physical function in adults with SCD. Understanding factors associated with impaired physical function will provide targets for future interventional studies to improve function. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study at a single academic sickle cell center. Participants completed the Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement Information System (ASCQ-Me) Stiffness Impact and Sleep Impact surveys and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function, Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, Fatigue, Cognitive Function, and Emotional Distress measures. For ASCQ-Me, higher scores imply better self-reported health. For PROMIS, higher scores mean higher levels of the concept being measured. Relationships between the variables thought to influence SCD experience were explored using analytical networks and centrality measures (INSIGHTS, Nanbar Health's data analysis and 3D visualization tool) that built upon calculated pairwise Spearman correlations of the non-normal variable set. Results Surveys were administered to 92 participants with 97% of participants completing all surveys. The mean score for each item was obtained across all participants. Scores were then stratified by age group and t-tests were performed to compare scores on results between groups for each ASCQ-Me and PROMIS measure. Across those who completed both surveys, the mean age was 43 (SD 13.7). The mean age for older adults was 54 (SD 8.6) and the mean age for younger adults was 30 (SD 5.5). More participants were female (58%) than male (42%). Genotypes included HbSS (58%), HbSβ 0-thalassemia (5%), HbSC, (24%), and HbSβ +-thalassemia (13%). The mean score on PROMIS Physical Function for all participants was 48.7 with 18% of responders reporting impaired physical function (score ≤ 40). Older adults had lower mean scores on PROMIS Physical Function (46.4) vs. for younger adults (51.6, p &amp;lt;0.05). The strongest correlations were between PROMIS Physical Function and ASQME Stiffness Impact (r s= 0.66; p&amp;lt;0.001), PROMIS Pain Intensity (r s= -0.61; p&amp;lt;0.001), PROMIS Pain Interference, (r s= -0.61; p&amp;lt;0.001), and ASCQ-Me Fatigue (r s = -0.55; p&amp;lt;0.001). There was a moderate positive correlation between PROMIS Physical Function and ASCQ-Me Sleep Impact (r s= 0.40; p&amp;lt;0.001) and PROMIS Cognitive Function (r s=0.36 p &amp;lt; 0.001) implying better sleep and better cognitive function were associated with better patient reported physical function. Lastly, better physical function had a low-moderate association with PROMIS Emotional Distress (r s= - 0.24; p &amp;lt; 0.05). We assessed relationships between all of the patient-reported outcome measures and found that the strongest relationships were between Pain Intensity and Pain Interference (r s= 0.69), Pain Intensity and Stiffness (r s= -0.67), and Fatigue and Cognitive Function (r s= -0.69). There was no central node identified (Figure). Conclusion Each factor evaluated in this study showed a statistically significant and clinically meaningful relationship to patient reported physical function. One of our major findings was that when mapped against each other, there was no central node explaining the identified correlations between the variables assessed. These results suggest that physical functioning is multifactorial and that there exist multiple modifiable factors that may influence function in people with SCD. Factors associated with physical function will serve as targets for future interventional studies to maintain and improve function in adults with SCD.